Humanism and the Meaning of Life Essay

In his fragment What is sympatheticism, Fred Edwords explains mankindism as a fount of philosophy that emphasizes reason, scientific inquiry, and human fulfillment in the natural world, and much rejects the importance of belief in God. He describes the different categories of secular humanitarianism that argon commons and the beliefs they hold. In Richard Taylors The Meaning of t iodine, aspects argon given on where marrow comes from in feeling if a pith is blush present. He searchs the story of Sisyphus to beautify how a bearing could be hollow and then explores the idea that every twenty-four hour period support today is ultimately marrowless as well.The degree to which the term by Taylor fits the verbal description of Humanism in the Edwords piece is to a pretty good degree. M either of the ideas near humanism that Edwords poses in his piece gleam in the way Taylor explored the nitty-gritty of expressions in his article. Edwords describes humanism with a call of prefigures, the outset being that a humanist isnt afraid to challenge and explore any ara of thought. Generally, the meaning of smell is a topic that has the tendency to scare off many people away imputable to the nature of inquiry required to even scratch the surface of any coif to the question. therefore, Taylor fits that aspect of humanism since his goal in his work was to explain his ideas on the field in a well thought out manner. Edwords second tier is that humanism digestes on human means for comprehending humankind with no claim to take over any type of transcendent knowledge, and another unmatched of his points is that humanism is a philosophy of desire. These points are evident in Taylors article as he tries to make disposition of life using rational imagination to approach each side of the topic. other one of Edwords points is that humanism is more have-to doe with with the here and now rather than life later death. Taylors main focus was touch ing on meaningless in life and obtaining contentment in any(prenominal) one finds themselves doing in life. There wasnt much to say close life after death, so this point stands true in Taylors article. Edwords outline point in his list was that humanism is a philosophy for those in dear with life. The way he described this point is very relatable to Taylors article in that Taylor didnt want to settle with prefabricated answers, alone now instead dove into the open-endedness that comes with trying to demote the meaning of life.Taylor fits into the category of Modern Humanism as described by Edwords. Edwords explained that this sectionalization of Humanism rejects all supernaturalism and relies primarily upon reason and science, democracy and human compassion. The points close humanism described in the prototypal paragraph above were labelled as what the Modern Humanist philosophy is boutive in Edwords writing. So throughout Taylors article, he showed a good underwrite of the qualities Edwords described for a modern humanist. Taylors positon on the question of the meaning of life does seem like a Humanist-type position.Taylor explored a broad topic that could have an unmeasured spectrum of different answers and wasnt afraid to plunk d feature into the controversial issues associated with it. He was in hobby of finding new knowledge and share it with his readers. He was also very realistic and looked at things from a logical standpoint. Taylor explains that our beds could have meaning if we have a dainty and unappeasable desire to be doing just what we find ourselves doing (this is what he says of Sisyphus, which could also be applied to us). Our life wouldnt be changed, unless it would still have a meaning.He says it is irrational because the desire itself would be only the product of substance in our veins, and not any that reason could discover, but a meaning nevertheless. Taylor also looked into the variety between us and other animated beings like insects in New Zealand caves, for instance. He explained that we are conscious of our activity. Our goals are things of which we are at least partly aware and can therefore in any(prenominal) sense appraise. Men have a history as other animals do not, such that each generation does not precisely resemble all those before.The meaning of life comes from the things to which we bend our backs day after day once we realize one by one our ephemeral plans are precisely the things in which our forgets are deep involved and precisely the things in which our interests lay. The day is sufficient to itself, and so is the life. A human being no sooner draws its first breath than he responds to the ordain that is in him to live. He no more asks whether it will be worthwhile or whether anything of importation will come of it. The point of his documentation is simply to be living, in the manner that it is his nature to be living.Edwords looks at publications from other humanist s that explain, for example, that humanism teaches that it is immoral to time lag for God to act for us. Humanists believe that the office lies within a person to prepare what kind of world they will live in. One must take it upon themselves to act upon what they deem correct and desirable. Edwords essentially give tongue to that life could have a type of meaning, and basically pointed towards the meaning of life being whatever you make of it. The meaning comes from your own actions and intents.You have the right to choose whatever path you see fit and act freely, to open new doors and accomplish not bad(p) things. Edwords description is similar to what Taylor said closely the meaning of life. Taylor explained that if you love what you are doing, you will feel like you were made to do that, therefore creating meaning in your life. Edwords explains it in a similar way that meaning in your life comes from your heart basically. some(prenominal) you are passionate about becomes what your life is about, and that is essentially the meaning you will find in your life.